Resolving Confusion about Deliberate Practice

by Justin Skycak on

Doesn't "beyond the edge of one's capabilities" mean that you can't do it? How can you practice it if you can't do it? Also, "performance-improving adjustments on every single repetition" is hard to understand in some realms of performance. For instance, does each step a runner takes involve feedback and improvement?

I recently received some questions about a snippet I wrote elsewhere:

  • "In the field of talent development, there is absolutely no debate about the most superior form of training. It's deliberate practice: mindful repetition on performance tasks just beyond the edge of one's capabilities.

    Deliberate practice is about making performance-improving adjustments on every single repetition. Any individual adjustment is small and yields a small improvement in performance – but when you compound these small changes over a massive number of action-feedback-adjustment cycles, you end up with massive changes and massive gains in performance.

    Deliberate practice is superior to all other forms of training. That is a "solved problem" in the academic field of talent development. It might as well be a law of physics. There is a mountain of research supporting the conclusion that the volume of accumulated deliberate practice is the single biggest factor responsible for individual differences in performance among elite performers across a wide variety of talent domains. (The next biggest factor is genetics, and the relative contributions of deliberate practice vs genetics can vary significantly across talent domains.)"

Doesn’t “beyond the edge of one’s capabilities” mean that you can’t do it? How can you practice it if you can’t do it?

“Beyond the edge of one’s capabilities” means that you’re working on things outside of your current repertoire. This could mean any of a number of things, e.g.:

  1. Maybe you can do it with scaffolding, but you are unable to do it without scaffolding.

    For instance, a musician might not be capable of playing a difficult section of a musical piece at full speed. So they might practice it while playing slowly (a type of scaffolding), and then gradually ramp up the speed while maintaining accuracy.

  2. Maybe you can do it sometimes, but not consistently/accurately.

    For instance, a gymnast might not be capable of landing a particular flip consistently with proper form. But maybe they can land it 50% of the time with shaky form. So they might practice improving their consistency and form on this skill.

In general, working on things outside of one’s repertoire is a core aspect of deliberate practice. Non-experts are often misled to practice within their level of comfort. This tends to be more effortful and less enjoyable, which can mislead non-experts to practice within their level of comfort.

For instance, Coughlan et al. (2014) observed this as a factor differentiating intermediate and expert Gaeilic football players:

  • "Expert and intermediate level Gaelic football players executed two types of kicks during an acquisition phase and pre-, post-, and retention tests. During acquisition, participants self-selected how they practiced and rated the characteristics of deliberate practice for effort and enjoyment.

    The expert group predominantly practiced the skill they were weaker at and improved its performance across pre-, post- and retention tests. Participants in the expert group also rated their practice as more effortful and less enjoyable compared to those in the intermediate group.

    In contrast, participants in the intermediate group predominantly practiced the skill they were stronger at and improved their performance from pretest to posttest but not on the retention test."

Even more generally, the idea of practicing outside of one’s repertoire can be generalized to the idea of engaging in a cycle of strain and adaptation. This is done in, e.g., Ericsson (2006). Here’s a snippet:

  • "When the human body is put under exceptional strain, a range of dormant genes in the DNA are expressed and extraordinary physiological processes are activated. Over time the cells of the body, including the brain (see Hill & Schneider, Chapter 37) will reorganize in response to the induced metabolic demands of the activity by, for example, increases in the number of capillaries supplying blood to muscles and changes in metabolism of the muscle fibers themselves.

    These adaptations will eventually allow the individual to execute the given level of activity without greatly straining the physiological systems. To gain further beneficial increases in adaptation, the athletes need to increase or change their weekly training activities to induce new and perhaps different types of strain on the key physiological systems."


Performance-improving adjustments on every single repetition” is hard to understand in some realms of performance. For instance, does each step a runner takes involve feedback and improvement?

If “performance-improving adjustments on every single repetition” is incomprehensible at the level you’re looking, then it’s an indication you need to zoom out a bit.

The same confusion can happen in, e.g., deliberate practice in math, if you zoom in too much. When a student solves a math problem, do we really expect every single pen stroke to involve feedback and improvement? No. You have to zoom out to the level of the problem.

I don’t know much about serious running, but I would expect that the appropriate level to view these deliberate practice cycles is not the level of a single step, but rather, a cohesive group of a taxing “deliberate practice” runs and easier “recovery” runs. At this level, it looks more like that cycle of strain/adaptation that is characteristic of deliberate practice.

And that level seems to align with what’s discussed in the literature – for instance, in Casado et al., 2020, Deliberate Practice in Training Differentiates the Best Kenyan and Spanish Long-Distance Runners, it is mentioned that “systematic training … included high-intensity training sessions considered deliberate practice (DP) and easy runs.”


References

Casado, A., Hanley, B., and Ruiz-Pérez, L.M. (2020). Deliberate Practice in Training Differentiates the Best Kenyan and Spanish Long-Distance Runners. European Journal of Sport Science, 20 (7). pp. 887-895.

Coughlan, E. K., Williams, A. M., McRobert, A. P., & Ford, P. R. (2014). How experts practice: A novel test of deliberate practice theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(2), 449.

Ericsson, K. A. (2006). The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance, 38(685-705), 2-2.