Division of Labor in a Group Project Is Division of Learning

by Justin Skycak on

Want to get notified about new posts? Join the mailing list and follow on X/Twitter.


In a lot of classroom group projects,

the strongest student does everything.

They carry their entire group.

And the weaker students don’t really learn anything.

It’s a structural failure mode of education.

∗     ∗     ∗

I know, I know.

From the outside, it can look pretty collaborative.

Makes for a good photo op.

Everyone’s discussing, engaged.

Or so it looks…

∗     ∗     ∗

But the thing is:

Engagement does not imply learning.

Learning requires direct contact with the work.

Pushing it forward yourself in a productive way.

∗     ∗     ∗

You need to attempt to retrieve things that you’ve learned, do it successfully, make a few mistakes, correct them, repeat again…

All right, you did it right this time.

Now you’ve learned.

And somebody else cannot do that process for you.

∗     ∗     ∗

You don’t learn by watching somebody else do that process.

You gotta do it yourself.

That’s why:

Division of labor in a group project is ultimately division of learning.

∗     ∗     ∗

Concentrating that labor on one student…

The smart kid who’s carrying their whole group, doing all the work for them…

That is a concentration of learning on that one student.

∗     ∗     ∗

Further reading: True active learning means… .



Want to get notified about new posts? Join the mailing list and follow on X/Twitter.